G
Guest
·I went down to Coal Creek Armory today, and picked up my CZ 75B. Just thought I would share my impressions...
Though there are a couple of rough spots to be addressed, the thing is built like an anvil, and I think this is going to be a really nice pistol, after I do a few things to make it mine, as well as to make it a bit more suited to the role I intend for it - range toy/comp gun. Overall, I like the ergonomics, which I find very Hi-Power-like (I know, some CZ guys hate to hear that). The beavertail-like tang on the rear of the frame is one area where I think the CZ actually trumps the HP. The controls are of a very traditional 1911-orthodox configuration, which is nice for me, since that is what I am used to, but I have to say the long double action trigger pull is atrocious (the trigger itself is a little rough around the edges, too). I have planned from the outset to install a single action trigger and hammer anyway, so I'm not too worried about that. I look forward to the short and sweet trigger pull that the CZ USA single action competition trigger, with two-way adjustment, will allow me to setup. I'm still undecided on where to source a sear, though. I like the simple, rugged, military-type sights, except for the dots, but, for this pistol, I think I would like an adjustable rear sight. I don't much like the looks or the idea of the LPA or other sights that fit the original dovetail, and sit high on top of the slide. The sight I have my eye on, so to speak, is the "Tactical Adjustable" rear sight sold by Caspian Arms Ltd.,
which fits a standard Novak low-mount sight cut (not the modified Novak sight cut required for Novak's tactical adjustable sight). What I need is to find out who will do this cut on my slide, as Novak's shop won't do it. If I can get this done, I will use the Caspian in the rear, with either a tritium dot, or a fiber-optic sight, in front. Provided it proves accurate, I will probably leave the stock barrel in place, but a Bar-sto, or other stainless match barrel, is not out of the question. Almost forgot to mention the finish. The baked-on polymer finish, IMO, leaves something to be desired, at least in the case of my pistol. I don't dig this type of finish in general, but I am much less than thrilled to find a couple of small pinholes and even a touch of splatter/drip. I'll most likely have the finish blasted off, and will do a Shooter's Solution manganese park at home. Finally, the stock plastic grips have a nice shape to them, but the feel just isn't there for me. The obvious move would be to order some replacements from Hakan or Omega, who both make very beautiful wood grips, but my experience with the VZ Gator Backs that are on my 1911 carry guns has me looking for black paper Micarta for my CZ. Unfortunately, neither Omega nor Hakan is up for working with this material, for their own reasons. I intend to inquire with John Van Zyck, of VZ Grips, about whether he would be willing to give it a shot. When last I spoke with him, he was working on development of Hi-Power grips, so he may be able and willing to do this.
I know a lot of you who read this will balk, and some will suggest that I could have bought this or that model to get, as OEM equipment, some of the modifications I have listed, but be assured I always choose carefully, and there's a method to my madness. I've only had this pistol in my possession for a few hours, and while I can't say I'd consider it quite on par with my 1911's (especially my recently customized Mil Spec), I do find myself already fairly infatuated with it (Heck, I've already given her a name!). There's no point in posting pics of a box-stock CZ 75B, but, when I have completed some of the above listed changes, I will do as nice a pictorial essay as I can muster with my limited photographic skill.
Though there are a couple of rough spots to be addressed, the thing is built like an anvil, and I think this is going to be a really nice pistol, after I do a few things to make it mine, as well as to make it a bit more suited to the role I intend for it - range toy/comp gun. Overall, I like the ergonomics, which I find very Hi-Power-like (I know, some CZ guys hate to hear that). The beavertail-like tang on the rear of the frame is one area where I think the CZ actually trumps the HP. The controls are of a very traditional 1911-orthodox configuration, which is nice for me, since that is what I am used to, but I have to say the long double action trigger pull is atrocious (the trigger itself is a little rough around the edges, too). I have planned from the outset to install a single action trigger and hammer anyway, so I'm not too worried about that. I look forward to the short and sweet trigger pull that the CZ USA single action competition trigger, with two-way adjustment, will allow me to setup. I'm still undecided on where to source a sear, though. I like the simple, rugged, military-type sights, except for the dots, but, for this pistol, I think I would like an adjustable rear sight. I don't much like the looks or the idea of the LPA or other sights that fit the original dovetail, and sit high on top of the slide. The sight I have my eye on, so to speak, is the "Tactical Adjustable" rear sight sold by Caspian Arms Ltd.,

I know a lot of you who read this will balk, and some will suggest that I could have bought this or that model to get, as OEM equipment, some of the modifications I have listed, but be assured I always choose carefully, and there's a method to my madness. I've only had this pistol in my possession for a few hours, and while I can't say I'd consider it quite on par with my 1911's (especially my recently customized Mil Spec), I do find myself already fairly infatuated with it (Heck, I've already given her a name!). There's no point in posting pics of a box-stock CZ 75B, but, when I have completed some of the above listed changes, I will do as nice a pictorial essay as I can muster with my limited photographic skill.