Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test - Handguns and Ammunition Forums
Forum Home    ::    Active Topics    ::    Hi-Powers and Handguns    ::    Stephen Camp's Blog    ::    Contact Us
Go Back   Handguns and Ammunition Forums > Ammunition & Gunsmithing > Ammo Discussion > Ammunition Tests Archive
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 08-09-2007, 11:16 PM   #1
Administrator
 
Josh Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wabash IN
Posts: 2,951
Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

Handgun: Taurus PT92, 5" barrel

Ammunition: Remington UMC 9mm standard pressure, 115gr, packaged in a 100 round "value pack" L9MM1B



I was asking around the various gun boards about this stuff a while back. I received mixed opinions as to how it would perform, so I went ahead and bought it with the intention of testing it. If the tests came out in its favor I would relegate it to second string carry ammuntion and woods ammunition. Here is the test using four layers of denim and water jugs.





Most important to any handgun/ammuniton combination is the the ability of the ammunition to function reliably in the firearm. Though I've done some gunsmithing to my Taurus to make it ultra-reliable, bullet shape never hurts either. As you can see, this Remington hollowpoint has almost a hardball profile.



Being old tech, this round is representative of older style hollowpoints designed to be used in pistols originally engineered to feed ball reliably. It works.





My standard water test setup...





And from the front...



That four layers of denim is thicker than it may look on camera. Take the leg of your blue jeans and fold it in half - imagine a hollowpoint bullet performing properly after being plugged with that much material.



Usually I insert a movie of the shot here, but I was shooting alone today.





After the shot I discovered two things: First, the bullet didn't seem affected in its performance by the denim as the front jug exploded and landed on the ground, seperated from the denim which had been taped on well. The second thing I noticed was that, after shredding the second jug as well as the first, the bullet veered off and disappeared. (I set the jug back up for photographic purposes.)



Though I could postulate what happened from the reaction of the milk jugs, I didn't have a bullet and therefore nothing was "solid." I set up two more jugs which were meant to be used to test my carry round, the Bonded Golden Saber. That'll have to wait a week or so now.





As you can see, the second setup is the same as the first.





Here is the front jug and denim exactly how they landed after my second shot. The jug seemed to have been launched into the air and was totally shredded, looking as if someone had put a mouse inside and thrown it to the coyotes! This is performance typical to hollowpoints the generation previous to our current "best" crop.



The previous generation of hollowpoints, while they typically expanded well, usually did so in the first few inches. This was true of the Silvertip, and in my experience, true also of the Federal C9BP "Classic" hollowpoint. I used this last to dispatch a sick rabbit once at 15 yards or so, and it took that rabbit apart, looking as if it had expanded almost fully before exiting the broadside shot.





These are jug numbers, from right to left, 2, 3, and 4. Notice how jug #2 is blown out, and jug #3 is losing water.





I found the spent bullet between jugs #3 and #4.





The bullet exhibited textbook expansion after passing through four layers of denim. Again, fold the leg of your blue jeans and imagine the bullet performing well after passing through that barrier. As well, I didn't measure correctly. These jugs are 6" thick instead of the 4" I am used to. Penetration was closer to 18" in water, or about 9" in ballistic gelatin.



Sorry about that, folks. The milk people need to tell me when they're going to change form factor! Oops! Seriously, I should have measured before jumping to conclusions. I will do so from now on.





A closer shot of the expanded bullet. As I said, textbook performance...





Curiously, the jacket and core did not try to seperate. Though I'm not too concerned about it, I may email Remington to see if they've begun bonding everything...





From the front, you can see how the jacket peeled back. Though not designed like the Black Talon, Ranger or SXT, this jacket is fairly sharp and protrudes enough that I'd guess it would see some "action" if used for serious purposes.



Honestly, this stuff surprised me. Though I carried the +P version of this ammuntion while waiting for some premium stuff to arrive, I didn't truly feel comfortable with it and used it for range fodder as soon as the premium ammunition arrived.



Not the best these days by any stretch of the imagination, this Remington ammunition, now (perhaps sadly) relegated to discount store bulk ammunition sales, still has plenty of punch to do most jobs which need doing. While not top-of-the-line any longer for barrier penetration, having been designed to the older penetration specification of 10" - 12" instead of the 12" - 14" we usually accept as the golden standard today, this old style ammo should still do the job in most defensive situations encountered by law enforcement and legally armed private citizens.



I'm favorably impressed.



Josh <><















__________________
Josh Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 11:26 PM   #2
Administrator
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,867
Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

Hello, Josh and thanks for the report. I've generally gotten very nice groups with the Remington 115-gr. JHP but it was in the +P version. I suspect but do not know for sure how the standard pressure is in that regard but it almost certainly as "enough" accuracy for defensive purposes.



Best.



Stephen A. Camp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2007, 11:51 PM   #3
pff
Member
 
pff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 2,617
Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

Josh,



Thanks for the work you've done with this load. Its greatly appreciated by folks on a budget.





Regards,



Pat
pff is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Old 08-10-2007, 01:08 AM   #4
Administrator
 
Josh Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wabash IN
Posts: 2,951
Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

Thank you.



I'm glad it could help someone out!



Josh <><



P.S. That's not rust on my pistol; I'm due for a new holster! J.S.
__________________
Josh Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2007, 06:25 AM   #5
Administrator
 
Bob Reed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,178
Rem 115gr Standard Pressure Water + Denim Test

Hello Josh & Thanks for your very well done report.



__________________
"LONG LIVE THE FN-BROWNING-SAIVE HIGH POWER"

John Browning & Dieudonne Saive's Designs Will Always be Light Years Ahead of All the Others.

I'd rather beat a bad guy to death with my Browning High Power, than shoot him dead with a "plastic pistol".

Fighting Tyrants & Traitors is a 24/7 Job that Must be Done!

The Second Amendment was not written in order to protect your right to shoot deer, it was written to protect your right to shoot tyrants if they take over the government. ~ Judge Andrew Napolitano

Free Men Do Not Ask Permission to Bear Arms. ~ Thomas Jefferson
Bob Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 09:19 PM   #6
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,497
Thats some very good 9mm hp ammo and hard to find in our area. I would like to pick another 5 box,s if I run accross it. Money well spent for a honest to goodness proven ammo in the %80 plus one stop ammo. Doe,s spending $50 and up for so called hot-rod ammo make the perp sit up and say, Boy that that hurt 7% more then roll over and die.
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 10:23 PM   #7
Member
 
one eye joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New England, USA
Posts: 464
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep View Post
Doe,s spending $50 and up for so called hot-rod ammo make the perp sit up and say, Boy that that hurt 7% more then roll over and die.
LMFAO, jeep........
__________________
SSG. US ARMY Republic of Viet Nam 1968-1969. Life Member of DAV & VFW. Certified NRA Instructor.
one eye joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 02:42 AM   #8
pff
Member
 
pff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 2,617
I'm still using it for carry. Pretty much quit plinking with it as its hit-or-miss finding it currently. When it was always on the shelf for a penny or two more than bulk ball I used it exclusively.

Still inexpensive enough to shoot enough to get the warm fuzzies about reliability. Kinda hard to do on a budget when you have five 9mm's and 30+ magazines.


Regards,

Pat
pff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 06:11 AM   #9
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,497
A local gun shop has the rem. 115 gr. hp bullets in the bags for 11.99. I load them with 6.2 grs. of Unique. They feed good and have good accuracy. I use Federal& WW primers The CCI have had crap reliability being hard or stale. I don,t use anything CCI anymore!!
jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2011, 09:46 AM   #10
Regulator
 
JayPee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,353
I will prolly be thrashed for saying this about an obviously popular round, but out of the eight 9mm pistols I've tried this ammo in, that is - 15 yard bench rest accuracy tests, only one of them would shoot it accurately at all. Guns that shoot other loads down around two inches at 15 yards will only group this particular Remington load into five or six inches, which in my book puts it into the questionable category as a defensive load.

Now, since the usual range for armed encounters is much shorter than 15 yards, you might conclude that this is acceptable service accuracy. But I won't use it on the grounds of a question I have: If this load won't group any better than that in seven out of eight pistols tried, what else does it do badly?

I haven't seen any of it in our local Walmarts in at least three years and I will never buy any more of it. I'd rather pay $40 for 25 rounds of proven, accurate ammo, than to pay the same amount for 100 rounds of a load I have serious doubts about.

Pat, Josh, Joe, I know you guys love this load, but I'd sure recommend you do some accuracy testing if you're going to continue carrying with it. It may or may not meet minimum accuracy standards in your particular carry gun. If a standard velocity 115 grain JHP is what you want, I'd sure go for the Federal C9BP, which Mr. Camp reviewed thoroughly at:

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/H...Federal115.htm

Let the thrashings begin.

(And to answer any lingering questions, it gags me to pay $40 for 25 rounds of ammo, just like it does you guys.)

JayPee
JayPee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Search tags for this page
115gr standard pressure gold dots
,
best standard pressure 9mm
,

demin nam water

,
denim test standard
,
gel test remington standard pressure 9mm 115gr jhp
,
is remington standard pressure 115 grain hollow point ammo enough for defense ?
,
is standard pressure 115 grain hollowpoints sufficient for defense
,
is the standard 115 grain 9mm hollowpoint sufficent for defense
,
remington 115 htp gel test
,
remington 9 mm 115 p gel test
,
remington 9mm 115 jhp test
,
remington umc 115 demin
,
remington umc 9 mm fmj review ballistics gel
,

remington umc 9mm jhp gel test

,
standard for carry out pressure test for jacket with air and water
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*TEST* "Short Barrel" 135gr+P Gold Dot Water/Denim Josh Smith Ammunition Tests Archive 4 09-02-2007 03:52 AM
Test By Request: BH 124gr+P GDHP Water/Denim Josh Smith Ammunition Tests Archive 5 08-19-2007 08:08 AM
Water Denim Test CCI .22 LR 5 Inch Barrel Ammunition Tests Archive 5 08-18-2007 08:36 AM
S&W 38 Spl Water + Denim Test Josh Smith Ammunition Tests Archive 0 08-09-2007 09:24 PM
Good Price? Rem 115gr HP Standard Pressure Josh Smith Ammo Discussion 12 08-07-2007 08:30 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.