Spinco Recoil Mgt.-Do these work? - Handguns and Ammunition Forums
Forum Home    ::    Active Topics    ::    Hi-Powers and Handguns    ::    Stephen Camp's Blog    ::    Contact Us
Go Back   Handguns and Ammunition Forums > Handguns > General Semiautos
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-22-2012, 09:07 AM   #1
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 296
Spinco Recoil Mgt.-Do these work?

I just read about a Spinco Recoil Managment Guide Rod for my Kimber Pro Carry, although they make them for various pistols including the Hi Power.

It appears to be a double spring system.

The cost is $84.95. Pretty pricey.

I'd like to know if anyone here has tried one of these.

Let me know what you think.
adguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:51 AM   #2
Bob Reed's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,178
Here's a review by Steve Camp on the one for The High Power http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/B...%20Sprinco.htm

John Browning & Dieudonne Saive's Designs Will Always be Light Years Ahead of All the Others.

I'd rather beat a bad guy to death with my Browning High Power, than shoot him dead with a plastic pistol.

Fighting Tyrants & Traitors is a 24/7 Job that Must be Done!

The Second Amendment was not written in order to protect your right to shoot deer, it was written to protect your right to shoot tyrants if they take over the government. ~ Judge Andrew Napolitano

Free Men Do Not Ask Permission to Bear Arms. ~ Thomas Jefferson
Bob Reed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 01:12 PM   #3
oberstlt's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 3,430
High praise from Mr. Camp I should think. However, I generally do not care for full length guide rods for my 1911s. A Kimber Pro Carry may be the exception. As I recall, they have an alloy frame which may benefit from such a system provided that function is not impaired.

Coming from a guy who has tried most of the gizmos and "new/improved" stuff from the 1970's and 1980's, I have sort of quit trying to fix stuff that is not actually broken. I would ask myself what the purpose of the kit is and what can I expect in return from it.

On an alloy gun, not beating up the gun may be a legitimate concern. However, I generally carry allow guns much more than I shoot them. $85 is a lot of ammo....
oberstlt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 01:55 PM   #4
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 296
Thanks so much. I appreciate the help.
adguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 03:59 PM   #5
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,442

About the same time Stephen Camp tried the Springco unit I was doing the same.

At almost $90.00 a pop the unit is pricey. It's also BEAUTIFULLY made. The quality is obvious. This is a departure from some earlier units I'd heard about, so a call to Springco's President, Alan Dugger, proved interesting.

According to Alan, Springco had undergone a reoranization and some problem staff was gone. Quality had been upgunned and the company was trying to repair the damage the predecessors had done.

His honesty and sincerety sold me and I purchased a unit for my Hi-Power. It worked perfectly and I have no complaints about it at all.

That said, I backed away from it because it changed the recoil impulse of the Hi-Power enough to where it didn't really feel "right" to me. That's subjective, you might like it.
I went back to using 18.5 lb recoil springs and a buffer.

If you want to try a unit there's no reason why not. I've heard no bad press concerning the Springco unit, so there's no reason you shouldn't give them a try.

weshowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 07:26 PM   #6
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 296
I'm kind of thinking of getting one for a .45.

Wes, did you find the 18.5lb recoil spring works as well as the Springco?
adguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2012, 11:56 PM   #7
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,442

You'll find a number of us that use the 18.5 lb spring in the Hi-Power. Factory weight is 17 lbs.

We're somwhat devided as a group. Many traditionalists use the 17 lb. spring and have no issues, but most run standard pressure ammo in their Hi-Powers.

If you're going to run hotter ammo I'd definetely run the 18.5 lb. spring and a buffer.

weshowe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2012, 03:30 PM   #8
chieftain's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Free State of Arizona
Posts: 6
I started using these things about 17 years ago. They used to make them here in Arizona. In a small town South East of Phoenix, Chandler. For over 10 years they have been making them in Texas.

I use them in alloy frame guns to protect the frame. I used to Carry and shoot SIG's for everything. My last carry SIG 228 has over 37,000 rounds through it. Even for competition I always shot full house factory loads. The guns NEVER broke.

Same today. The only guns with the Springco unit are my alloy frame guns. Beretta, SIG, and one of my 22 1911's is a 5" CDP with the Springco unit.

I do not use one in my CCW/EDC Colt LtWgt Commander. That gun doesn't get shot much anyway. Maybe only 1000-1500 rounds a year.

Now Glock has validated the concept too, with their Gen 4's. Most short barreled 1911's (shorter than Commander length) run similar type spring setups too.

You get a little less recoil but many folks don't feel the difference. If you video your guns you will see the recoil diffence. Most folks shooting 9's, will not need it for recoil at all. As I said I used it to go easier on the alloy frames of my guns.

Good luck.

Semper Fi

Stupid should hurt

“To lead untrained men in to war, is to waste them.” - Confucius

“We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality” - Ayn Rand
chieftain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2012, 06:32 PM   #9
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 281
I have a number of them in various pistols (BER 92, SIG 226, SA XD, HI Power, Glock 35) and here is what I have learned:

They make no difference in felt recoil or muzzle rise, at least none I have ever perceived.

They do stop the slide from battering the frame, and IMHO they are worth the money because of this.

I do NOT recommend them on Glocks since they have "variable" spring rate and the Glock design relies on the recoil spring to hold the slide in battery against the trigger pull force which is loading the striker spring as you pull the trigger. On mine, I can see the slide move slightly out of battery as the trigger is pulled using the dual-spring guide rod, so I chucked it into the closet (available for sale at reduced price).
bountyhunter is offline   Reply With Quote

Search tags for this page
p229 recoil reducer
sig p229 recoil reducer
sprinco 1911 recoil reducer
sprinco kimber pro
sprinco p226 review
sprinco recoil reducer
sprinco recoil reducer 1911
sprinco recoil reducer 1911 review

sprinco recoil reducer review

sprinco recoil reducer review glock
sprinco recoil reduction system
sprinco recoil reduction system for sig p229
sprinco reviews
springco review
springco reviews
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The HP at work rgregoryb The Hi Power Forum 5 03-20-2010 12:15 AM
Carry at Work? Josh Smith Practice and Tactics 6 02-10-2010 04:53 PM
Can/do you carry at work? General Firearm Questions & Discussions 19 03-22-2006 04:26 AM
Trigger work thompsongunner The Hi Power Forum 7 02-24-2006 04:38 PM
Do changing recoil springs reduce recoil? Chris Stephens General Semiautos 2 02-04-2005 06:14 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.